Categories
Archives
Receive Email Updates
-
-
Certified Licensing Professionals, Inc., 2021 Disclaimer
This blog, Patents4Life, does not contain legal advice and is for informational purposes only. Its publication does not create an attorney-client relationship nor is it a solicitation for business. This is the personal blog of Warren Woessner and does not reflect the views of Schwegman Lundberg & Woessner, or any of its attorneys or staff. To the best of his ability, the Author provides current and accurate information at the time of each post, however, readers should check for current information and accuracy.
- About Me
Warren D. Woessner Pages
Archives
Category Archives: Non-U.S. Practice
A Hidden Danger Under The EPC – The “Extension Trap”
Provided to us by Dr. Stefan Danner of DHS Patentanwalts GmbH, find below the current issue of the biotech IP newsletter dealing with recent EPO case law on Article 123(2)(3) EPC. Extension Trap
Posted in Non-U.S. Practice
Tagged Dr. Steffan Danner, EPC, Patent Law, Warren Woessner
Leave a comment
Biotech IP Newsletters
Find below biotech IP newsletters recently provided by Dr. Stefan Danner. SPCs For Combination Products – Opinion Of The Advocate General EPO Ruling On The Patentability Of Medical Treatments By Therapy
Posted in Non-U.S. Practice
Tagged Dr. Stefan Danner, EPO, intellectual property, Patent Law, Warren Woessner
Leave a comment
One step ahead and one step backward for the EU patent
The following is a contribution from Camilla Rendal Nielsen of Zacco Denmark A/S 1. The EU Competiveness Council have authorised “enhanced cooperation” in the area of unitary patent protection, and. 2. The EU court now states that the proposed Patents Court … Continue reading
Posted in Non-U.S. Practice
Tagged camilla rendal nielsen, EPO, EU Treaty, European patent, intellectual property, ip, IP law tools, Patent Law, patents, Warren Woessner, zacco
Leave a comment
Canadian Ruling Supports “Antibody Exception”
In my recent post on the Centocor v. Abbott decision, I noted that the Fed. Cir. had at least preserved the “antibody exception,” which I define as permitting broad claims to structurally uncharacterized antibodies (monoclonal and polyclonal) if the structure … Continue reading