Category Archives: Post-Grant Issues

Federal Circuit Clarifies Prosecution Laches

  The facts of Cancer Research Tech. v. Barr Labs., Inc., App. No. 2010-1204 (Fed. Cir. November 9, 2010) (PDF at end of post) are almost more interesting than the holding, which is : “We…now hold that to establish [the … Continue reading

Posted in Post-Grant Issues | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Do You Have Anything To Prove? Frye Fries A Half-Baked Standard

The recent precedential decision, Ex parte Frye, Appeal No. 2009-006013 (Bd. App. 2010) reversed the Examiner’s rejection of a claim to a shoe. More importantly, the Board emphasized that the Board on appeal “reviews the particular finding(s) contested by an appellant … Continue reading

Posted in Post-Grant Issues | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Privilege Primer

Guest Posting from Ron Shutz Case: Keefe v. Bernard, 2009 W.L. 346738 (Oct. 30, 2009). Topic: Corporate Attorney/Client & Work Product Privilege Facts The attorney representing both the doctor and his corporate employer in a medical malpractice action interviewed an … Continue reading

Posted in Post-Grant Issues | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

JUDGE RADER DEFENDS THE FUTURE OF IP

Judge Randall Rader of the Federal Circuit was the luncheon speaker at the AIPLA Annual Meeting Friday in DC and, as usual, he spoke well. So many of his fellow- (and one female) judges where there that he quipped: “Now … Continue reading

Posted in Post-Grant Issues | Tagged , , | Leave a comment