Tag Archives: Chakrabarty

Ex parte Ren-Hie Xu – Are Cultured Mammalian Cells Natural Products?

Posted on March 27, 2019 by Warren Woessner

The Examiner in Appeal no. 2017-003416 (Mar. 1, 2019) had rejected this claim as directed to a natural product: “18. An in vitro culture comprising a substantially pure, replenishable population of synchronous primate trophoblast cells, wherein the synchronous primate trophoblast … Continue reading →

Posted in Patent Eligible Subject Matter | Tagged , , , , , | 1 Comment

Split Federal Circuit Panel Holds That Method of Medical Treatment Claims are Patent Eligible

Posted on March 18, 2019 by Warren Woessner

In Natural Alternatives Int’l., Inc. v. Creative Compounds, LLC, Appeal No. 2018-1295 (Fed. Cir., March 15, 2019) a divided panel of the Fed. Cir. held that claims to methods of increasing the anaerobic working capacity in a human subject by … Continue reading →

Posted in Patent Eligible Subject Matter | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Knowles and Prosser Posit that the Expansion of s. 101 by the Supreme Court is Unconstitutional

Posted on January 17, 2019 by Warren Woessner

Sherry Knowles (Knowles Intellectual Strategies, LLC) and Anthony Prosser, one of Knowles’ agents have written an engrossing article (18 J. Marshall Rev; Intell. Prop. L. 144 (2018) arguing that the Supreme Court has meandered so far from the statutory language of … Continue reading →

Posted in Patent Eligible Subject Matter | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Director Iancu’s IPO Address and Judge Rich

Posted on September 27, 2018 by Warren Woessner

Although Director Iancu’s address primarily aims at the difficulty of determining when a claim is directed to an abstract idea, his precursor guiding light is clearly the late Judge Giles Rich. Notably, Iancu quotes from Judge Rich. These quotes are … Continue reading →

Posted in Patent Eligible Subject Matter | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment