Tag Archives: DNA

Update, Partner and Innovate — AUTM Eastern Regional Meeting

I will be on a panel entitled “Kicking the Hornet’s Nest – Patenting Early Stage Technology” at the AUTM Eastern Regional Meeting in Baltimore (May 24th). I will be joined by Esther Kepplinger, Director of Patent Operations at Wilson Sonsini … Continue reading

Posted in Conferences and Classes | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Myriad Oral Arguments – Section 101 vs. Chemistry 101?

After listening to the IPO webinar and reading the detailed account by Kevin Noonan in PatentDocs on the Myriad oral arguments, I was somewhat heartened to “hear” the Fed. Cir. panel moving toward “getting it” regarding what an isolated DNA … Continue reading

Posted in Patent Eligible Subject Matter | Tagged , , , , | 2 Comments

Federal Court Hears Myriad Gene Case This Morning

The following is a guest post from Ann McCrackin. I attended oral arguments at the CAFC on Monday for Association for Molecular Pathology v. Myriad Genetics, Inc.   The three-judge panel included Judge Bryson, Judge Lourie and Judge Moore.  Most of the … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of Proof | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

ACLU Files Its Brief in Myriad – Argues DNA Is A Blueprint Without a Name

On November 30, 2010, the ACLU filed its brief at the Federal Circuit in AMP et al. v. USPTO and Myriad Genetics, Inc. et al. If you have been reading my posts on this suit, you are by now probably … Continue reading

Posted in Patent Eligible Subject Matter | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment