Categories
Archives
Receive Email Updates
-
-
Certified Licensing Professionals, Inc., 2021 Disclaimer
This blog, Patents4Life, does not contain legal advice and is for informational purposes only. Its publication does not create an attorney-client relationship nor is it a solicitation for business. This is the personal blog of Warren Woessner and does not reflect the views of Schwegman Lundberg & Woessner, or any of its attorneys or staff. To the best of his ability, the Author provides current and accurate information at the time of each post, however, readers should check for current information and accuracy.
- About Me
Warren D. Woessner Pages
Archives
Tag Archives: intellectual property
“If Wishes Were Horses” – Roberts’ Dissent from Myriad
After reading Obergefell v. Hodges, 576 U.S.___(2015), (a copy is found at the end of this post) I was struck by Justice Robert’s dissent – which excoriates the majority for legislating from the bench and basing its opinion on “social … Continue reading
NEW BOOK REVISITS THE “INSTANT CAMERAS PATENT WAR”
I am not sure that I have ever reviewed a book review before, but Donald Chisum and Janice Mueller have written a thorough and thoughtful review of Ronald Fierstein’s book, “A Triumph of Genius” recounting one of the major patent infringement suits of … Continue reading
Kimble v. Marvel – Supreme Court Sticks With Brulotte Rule
In a rather breezy opinion filled with Spiderman puns and references, Justice Kagan, writing for a 6/3 Court, affirmed that Brulotte v. Thys Co., 379 U.S. 29 (1964) controlled the outcome of this dispute over Marvel’s decision to halt royalty … Continue reading
Posted in Licensing
Tagged Brulotte Rule, Federal Circuit, intellectual property, ip, Kimble v Marvel, Spiderman, Supreme Court, Warren Woessner
Leave a comment
Teva v. Sandoz – “Strange Brew” Boils Over
On June 18, 2015, a divided Fed. Cir. panel reaffirmed that the key claim of a Teva patent, U.S. Pat. No. 5,800,808, was invalid as indefinite, although the Fed. Cir. had previously been reversed twice by the Supreme Court – … Continue reading