Categories
Archives
Receive Email Updates
-
-
-
Certified Licensing Professionals, Inc., 2021 
Disclaimer
This blog, Patents4Life, does not contain legal advice and is for informational purposes only. Its publication does not create an attorney-client relationship nor is it a solicitation for business. This is the personal blog of Warren Woessner and does not reflect the views of Schwegman Lundberg & Woessner, or any of its attorneys or staff. To the best of his ability, the Author provides current and accurate information at the time of each post, however, readers should check for current information and accuracy.
-
- About Me
Warren D. Woessner
Pages
Archives
Tag Archives: ip
Australia: Cancer Voices v Myriad Opinion Affirmed
This is a guest post from Paul Cole. An opinion was handed down earlier today by the Federal Court of Australia – Full Court (Allsop C.J., Downsett, Kenny, Bennett and Middleton J.J., D’Arcy v Myriad Genetics Inc [2014] FCAFC 115 … Continue reading
Posted in EP and UK Practice
Tagged biotechnology law, EPO, intellectual property, ip, Myriad, Patent Law, patents, Paul Cole, Warren Woessner
2 Comments
101 Rejections Under the Guidelines: Mayo and Myriad “Go Viral”
This is a guest post from Hans Sauer, Deputy General Counsel, Intellectual Property for BIO. “Recently, I set out to find real-world examples of recent rejections under the USPTO Guidance, to do my own sampling rather than rely on reported … Continue reading
Posted in Claim Interpretation
Tagged bio, biotechnology law, biotechnology news, Federal Circuit, Hans Sauer, intellectual property, ip, Mayo, Myriad, Patent Law, patents, USPTO, Warren Woessner
1 Comment
FDA’s New Biosimilars Guidance
The following has been posted with the permission of their authors James E. Valentine and James C. Shehan of Hyman, Phelps & McNamara as part of their FDA Law Blog. *** August 09, 2014 FDA’s New Biosimilars Guidance Has Sponsors … Continue reading
Fed. Cir.: Antitrust Issues Can Arise From Hatch-Waxman Litigation
In Tyco Healthcare Group v. Mutual Pharm. Co., App. no. 13-1386 (Fed. Cir. August 6, 2014), a divided panel of the court reversed a district court’s summary judgment ruling dismissing antitrust charges brought by ANDA filer Mutual against patent-holder Tyco. (A … Continue reading