Categories
Archives
Receive Email Updates
-
-
-
Certified Licensing Professionals, Inc., 2021 
Disclaimer
This blog, Patents4Life, does not contain legal advice and is for informational purposes only. Its publication does not create an attorney-client relationship nor is it a solicitation for business. This is the personal blog of Warren Woessner and does not reflect the views of Schwegman Lundberg & Woessner, or any of its attorneys or staff. To the best of his ability, the Author provides current and accurate information at the time of each post, however, readers should check for current information and accuracy.
-
- About Me
Warren D. Woessner
Pages
Archives
Tag Archives: ip
“Obamacare” Survives – Including Path to Generic Biologicals
Biotech patent attorneys rejoice – no matter if you represent generic companies or NDA holders, the 5-4 decision of the Supreme Court upholding the “individual mandate” – not under the commerce clause, but as an appropriate use of Congress’ power to … Continue reading
Posted in Follow-On Biologics
Tagged generic biologicals, intellectual property, ip, Obamacare, Patent Law, patents, Supreme Court, Warren Woessner
Leave a comment
Lilly Files Amicus Brief in Myriad Remand – With Friends Like This…
Following its reversal of the Fed. Cir.’s decision in Mayo v. Prometheus (“Mayo”), the Supreme Court GVR’d in response to AMP’s (read: ACLU’s) appeal of Myriad’s claims to isolated DNA sequences and to a method of screening potential anti-cancer drugs … Continue reading
From The EPO: Oral Proceedings/Interviews Before Examining Division Can Be Held Via Videoconferencing
This is a guest post from Lynnea Fedyk, legal process assistant at Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A. Attached are two documents of particular interest regarding Oral Proceedings by video conference and submission of email during video conference. Should you like to … Continue reading
Posted in EP and UK Practice
Tagged biotechnology law, biotechnology news, EPO, intellectual property, ip, IP law tools, Warren Woessner
Leave a comment
Lather. Rinse. Repeat — In re Baxter International, Inc.
The following is a guest blog from Ron Schutz of Robins, Kaplan, Miller & Ciresi. It just got it easier for infringers to use reexamination as a way to wash a judicial patent validity determination right out of their hair. … Continue reading