Tag Archives: Mayo

Genetic Technologies v. Bristol Myers – 101 At Work

In the recent memorandum opinion, the court invalidated claim 1 of U.S. Pat. No. 5,612,179, owned by Genetic Technologies, Ltd., as “impermissibly [claiming] a natural phenomenon.” (Genetic Technologies, Ltd. v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, C.A. No. 12-394-LPS (D. Delaware, Oct. 30, … Continue reading

Posted in Patent Eligible Subject Matter | Tagged , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

101 Rejections Under the Guidelines: Mayo and Myriad “Go Viral”

This is a guest post from Hans Sauer, Deputy General Counsel, Intellectual Property for BIO. “Recently, I set out to find real-world examples of recent rejections under the USPTO Guidance, to do my own sampling rather than rely on reported … Continue reading

Posted in Claim Interpretation | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

USPTO TRIPs over Myriad-Mayo guidance

Timothy W. Roberts, Chartered Patent Attorney; MA (Oxon); LL.D (honoris causa, Sheffield University) Paul G. Cole,  Chartered Patent Attorney;  MA (Oxon); LLM, NottinghamTrent; Visiting Professor, Bournemouth University The above UK-based European Practitioners have today filed comments at the USPTO arguing … Continue reading

Posted in Patent Eligible Subject Matter | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Myriad Guidance Comments

The USPTO is now publishing comments http://www.uspto.gov/patents/law/comments/myriad-mayo_guidance_comments.jsp  

Posted in Patent Eligible Subject Matter | Tagged , , , , , , , | 1 Comment