Tag Archives: Patent Law

“Handbook of Quality Procedures Before the EPO”

The ECP, epi and Business Europe have collaborated to produce a downloadable, fifty page guide to practice before the EPO. While not binding on Examiners, it was issued under the authority of the EPO and is a sort of mini-MPEP, … Continue reading

Posted in EP and UK Practice | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

PTO To Biotech Examiners – We’ll Get Back To You!

On March 21, 2012, Andrew H Hirschfield, Associate Commissioner for Patent Examination Policy, sent a short memo to the Patent Examining Corps to inform them about the decision in Prometheus v. Mayo. The “preliminary guidance” that was provided included a … Continue reading

Posted in Patent Eligible Subject Matter | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Unnatural Acts – Patenting Diagnostic Tests Post-Prometheus

The US Supreme Court case of Mayo v. Prometheus has generated a lot of interest precisely because it clouds the future of patent claims to diagnostic methodologies in general and to ‘personalized medicine’ in specific. The decision is likely to … Continue reading

Posted in Patent Eligible Subject Matter | Tagged , , , | 1 Comment

Indian Patent Office Grants Compulsory License To Bayer Drug

Finding that Bayer had failed the requirement to “work” the invention in India, e.g., manufacture and sell at a reasonable price, the Indian Patent Office granted Natco Pharma, an Indian company, a “compulsory license” to make, use and sell  a … Continue reading

Posted in Working Requirements | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment