Categories
Archives
Receive Email Updates
-
-
-
Certified Licensing Professionals, Inc., 2021 
Disclaimer
This blog, Patents4Life, does not contain legal advice and is for informational purposes only. Its publication does not create an attorney-client relationship nor is it a solicitation for business. This is the personal blog of Warren Woessner and does not reflect the views of Schwegman Lundberg & Woessner, or any of its attorneys or staff. To the best of his ability, the Author provides current and accurate information at the time of each post, however, readers should check for current information and accuracy.
-
- About Me
Warren D. Woessner
Pages
Archives
Tag Archives: Prometheus v. Mayo
Supreme Court Reverses In Prometheus v. Mayo!
In a decision dated March 20, 2012, Justice Breyer writing for a unanimous court, held that claims to administering a drug, followed by measuring the levels of metabolites of the drug, in order to optimize the amount administered, are not patent … Continue reading
Top 2011 IP Stories on Patents4Life
I spent a day or two looking back over the breaking IP news that resulted in posts on Patents4Life. I wrote most of them, but want to take a pause to thank regular contributors Paul Cole, Ron Schutz and Stefan … Continue reading
Posted in Miscellaneous
Tagged AIA, America Invents Act, AMP, ANDA, Bayh-Dole Act, biotechnology, biotechnology law, biotechnology news, caraco, court of appeals, Dr. Stefan Danner, European patent, Federal Circuit, intellectual property, ip, microsoft v i4i, Myriad, Patent Law, patents, Paul Cole, Pharmaceutical law, Prometheus v. Mayo, saint-gobain, Schutz, sherley, Stanford v Roche, Supreme Court, Therasense, USPTO, Warren Woessner, WDR
Leave a comment
Oral Argument in Mayo v. Prometheus – Why Mayo Will Lose
On December 7th at 10:05 a.m., the Supreme Court heard oral arguments (transcript at end of this post) in the “Prometheus case,” presented by Stephen M. Shapiro of Meyer Brown (Mayo) and Richard P. Bess of Latham & Watkins. Solicitor … Continue reading
Prometheus’s Brief – Don’t Confuse Us With “LabCorp”
It took me a while to get around to reading Prometheus’s brief to the Supreme Court in Mayo v. Prometheus Labs., No. 10-1150 (S. Ct. Oct. 31, 2011), because I was pretty sure how it would read and, in fact, … Continue reading
Posted in Patent Eligible Subject Matter
Tagged Bilski, LabCorp, Patent Law, Prometheus v. Mayo, Supreme Court, Warren Woessner
Leave a comment