Categories
Archives
Receive Email Updates
-
-
-
Certified Licensing Professionals, Inc., 2021 
Disclaimer
This blog, Patents4Life, does not contain legal advice and is for informational purposes only. Its publication does not create an attorney-client relationship nor is it a solicitation for business. This is the personal blog of Warren Woessner and does not reflect the views of Schwegman Lundberg & Woessner, or any of its attorneys or staff. To the best of his ability, the Author provides current and accurate information at the time of each post, however, readers should check for current information and accuracy.
-
- About Me
Warren D. Woessner
Pages
Archives
Tag Archives: Supreme Court
Supreme Court Rules That “Secret Sales” Can Qualify as Prior Art
Pre-AIA, 35 USC 102(b) stated that a person is entitled to a patent unless “the invention was patented or described in a printed publication… or in public use or on sale in the country, more than one year prior to … Continue reading
Legal Wiggle Room in the Joint AIPLA-IPO Proposal on Patentability?
I recently took another look at the Joint AIPLA-IPO Proposal on Patent Eligibility that was prompted by the scheduling of a discussion meeting by the Minnesota Intellectual Property Law Association. I confess that I did not participate in either the … Continue reading
Posted in Patent Eligible Subject Matter
Tagged AIPLA, Ariosa, Director Iancu, Federal Circuit, IPO, Justice Beyer, Mayo/Alice, Meriel, MIPLA, s. 101, Supreme Court
Leave a comment
UCB, Inc. v. Accord Healthcare, Inc. – Can a Racemic Mixture be a “Lead Compound.”
UCB v. Accord, Appeal no. 2016-2610 et al. (Fed. Cir., May 23, 2018) may be headed to the Supreme Court, which prompted me to take another look at this opinion. This was a decision in Hatch-Waxman litigation, in which a … Continue reading
Posted in Obviousness
Tagged Federal Circuit, Hatch-Waxman, Judge Bryson, Judge Prost, Judge Stoll, Opinion, s. 103, Supreme Court, UCB v. Accord, Warren Woessner
Leave a comment