Categories
Archives
Receive Email Updates
-
-
-
Certified Licensing Professionals, Inc., 2021 
Disclaimer
This blog, Patents4Life, does not contain legal advice and is for informational purposes only. Its publication does not create an attorney-client relationship nor is it a solicitation for business. This is the personal blog of Warren Woessner and does not reflect the views of Schwegman Lundberg & Woessner, or any of its attorneys or staff. To the best of his ability, the Author provides current and accurate information at the time of each post, however, readers should check for current information and accuracy.
-
- About Me
Warren D. Woessner
Pages
Archives
Tag Archives: Therasense
PTO Proposes Supplemental Examination Rules – Extremely Expensive and Incredibly Complex
On January 25, 2012, the USPTO published proposed rules to implement the supplemental examination provisions of the America Invents Act (“AIA”). This procedure is intended to be utilized by patent owners to “clean up” patents of iffy validity before, say, … Continue reading
Posted in AIA Patent Reform
Tagged America Invents Act, Examination, Patent Law, Therasense, USPTO, Warren Woessner
Leave a comment
Top 2011 IP Stories on Patents4Life
I spent a day or two looking back over the breaking IP news that resulted in posts on Patents4Life. I wrote most of them, but want to take a pause to thank regular contributors Paul Cole, Ron Schutz and Stefan … Continue reading
Posted in Miscellaneous
Tagged AIA, America Invents Act, AMP, ANDA, Bayh-Dole Act, biotechnology, biotechnology law, biotechnology news, caraco, court of appeals, Dr. Stefan Danner, European patent, Federal Circuit, intellectual property, ip, microsoft v i4i, Myriad, Patent Law, patents, Paul Cole, Pharmaceutical law, Prometheus v. Mayo, saint-gobain, Schutz, sherley, Stanford v Roche, Supreme Court, Therasense, USPTO, Warren Woessner, WDR
Leave a comment
BIO’s Modest Proposal – Eliminate Rule 56
BIO recently sent Director Kappos 13 pages of comments on the PTO’s proposed revisions to 37 C.F.R. §1.56(b). (A copy of the comments is available at the end of this post.) BIO clearly is struggling to reconcile the differing views … Continue reading
Powell v. Home Depot – False Petition Not “Egregious Misconduct”
In Therasense, the Fed. Cir. held that inequitable conduct can be based on non-prior art misconduct, which was characterized as an exception to the “but-for” rule of materiality set out in the decision. This seemed to me to be a … Continue reading
Posted in Inequitable Conduct/Rule 56
Tagged Federal Circuit, Patent Law, Powell v Home Depot, Therasense, Warren Woessner
2 Comments