Tag Archives: USPTO examiner

Director Kappos Kills Prosecution Regulations Package

Two years of fear and loathing have ended, as the USPTO has announced that it is rescinding the “Continuations” and “Claims” rules that have been hanging over the heads of practitioners, and will move to dismiss/vacate the pending lawsuit over … Continue reading

Posted in USPTO Practice and Policy | Tagged , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Patent Office Provides Slideshow to Examiners to Assist in Testing Claims for Statutory Subject Matter

As a supplement to the “instructions” discussed in my last post, the PTO has now provided a compact slideshow to Examiners to assist them in evaluating claims for statutorily patentable machines, processes or compostions of matter. Ironically,the flowcharts are a … Continue reading

Posted in USPTO Practice and Policy | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

PTO Issues Interim Examination Instructions for Patentable Subject Matter and Invites Comments

On August 24, the PTO issued interim instructions (not rules) to guide Examiners post-Bilski. I did not see this as a major event, given that the Supreme Court will soon be reviewing the Bilski “machine or transformation” (M or T) … Continue reading

Posted in USPTO Practice and Policy | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

GETTING TO ALLOWANCE – SEVEN HABITS OF HIGHLY EFFECTIVE CLIENTS

1. Tell Your Patent Attorney What You Want Your Patent To Do. IP attorneys are continuously told that we should be business partners with our clients, not just patent scribes. But there are lots of ways to protect an invention. … Continue reading

Posted in USPTO Practice and Policy | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment